Diario del seduttore. Front Cover. Søren Kierkegaard Diario di un seduttore · Sören Kierkegaard Bibliographic information. QR code for Diario del seduttore . Søren Kierkegaard, Diario di un seduttore. July 7, ·. Søren Kierkegaard, Diario di un seduttore. Image may contain: text. K Likes39 CommentsK. Diario di un seduttore by Sören Kierkegaard, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.
|Published (Last):||12 April 2014|
|PDF File Size:||8.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I can imagine him able to bring a girl to the point where he was sure she would sacrifice all then he would leave without a word let a u a declaration a promise. The unhappy girl would retain the consciousness of it with double bitterness because there was not the slightest thing she could appeal to. She could only be constantly tossed about in a terrible witches’ dance at one moment reproaching herself forgiving him at another reproaching him and then since the relationship would only have been actual in a figurative sense she would constantly have to contend with the doubt that the whole thing might only have been an imagination.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Return to Book Page. The Seducer’s Diary records Johannes’s discovery of a girl with the Shakespearean name Cordelia, whom he sets out to control. Intricately, meticulously, cunningly, the seduction proceeds. sduttore
No detail is too small to escape Johannes. This djario has an intimate quality and at the same time a detaching The Seducer’s Diary records Johannes’s discovery of a girl with the Shakespearean name Cordelia, whom he sets out to control. This position has an intimate quality and at the same time a detaching dignity.
Diario del seduttore by Søren Kierkegaard (3 star ratings)
Published September 7th by Princeton University Press diaroo published To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about The Seducer’s Diaryplease sign up. Do I have to know a lot about Kierkegaard’s theories before reading this?
Or would I understand the book as I read?
In this book Kierkegaard shows the characteristics and the limits of aestetic life: The last one sefuttore to other works – such as Fear and Trembling – so you only need to know that Kierkegaard distinguishes three different stages: Then, because of Kierkegaard religious education, he will show you why aestetic life is solved in a failure, and from this point, this book is connected with the other part of Enten-Eller, where there is a comparison between aestetic and ethic life.
So, you need to know: Hegel is not necessary to deal with this book, but remember that Kierkegaard can’t stand him and his Idealism. See 1 question about The Seducer’s Diary…. Lists with This Book. Aug 23, Khashayar Mohammadi rated it really liked it Shelves: I first read this book right after “Fear and Trembling”; kkerkegaard having just finished such a complex and dense philosophical book, I did not comprehend the point of “The Seducer’s Diary”, and si it fitted in Kierkegaard’s philosophical diiario.
Kierkegaard is a writer with tremendous philosophical density, and every work of his must be read carefully, and preferably more than once. Oct 02, Riku Sayuj rated it really liked it Shelves: Should the morality change in any way?
Mephistopheles is a seducer, the poor devil. The eternal seducer, but the one seduttoe bores of his victims at the cusp. Or is that zeduttore what he tells himself? Jul 06, Brigitte rated it really liked it. This short work is obviously nu to read because Kierkegaard’s style, although a bit antiquated, is very enticing.
But this work is also difficult to read without outrage. Quel type tordu, ce Kierkegaard! What I find especially interesting is that this short piece is essential to his work since eventually Regine the fictional Cordelia became his muse. Which is to say that he the fictional Johannes was afraid of life since he could not live with the real woman and preferred living with the idea of her in his mind.
Pretty sad and unhealthy, but so very common. To me they have kept a certain humanism, which I believe might be the result of their living through WWII, an experience that forced them to make a choice, and what they chose was to be politically engaged.
To me this is essential and healthy since locking oneself in one’s intellect implies that one refuses oierkegaard live. In the vast literature of love, The Seducer’s Diary is an intricate curiosity–a feverishly intellectual attempt id reconstruct an erotic failure as a pedagogic success, diarko wound masked as a boast.
It can be argued that no other single woman has been so instrumental in a major philosopher’s dev In the vast literature of love, The Seducer’s Diary is an intricate curiosity–a feverishly intellectual attempt to reconstruct an erotic failure as a pedagogic success, a wound masked as a boast. It can be argued that no other single woman has been so instrumental in a major philosopher’s development as Regine was to Kierkegaard.
In some ways, it is difficult to understand Kierkegaard fully without at least a cursory knowledge of his failed relationship to Regine. You need a bit of context to understand The Seducer’s Diary: Kierkegaard wrote it shortly after breaking off hn engagement to Regine Olsen, having given up the relationship to pursue what he saw as his spiritual calling, and it’s universally regarded as his attempt to re-contextualise this event for the heartbroken Olsen, portraying what happened between them u a calculated seduction on his part.
One might question whether this would really make things kier,egaard for the rejected party! To this end, Kierkegaard casts himself as the manipulative narrator, Johannes, while the Regine character is named Cordelia.
Johannes is essentially a professional seducer who pursues women only to the point that they are ready to give everything to him; then he abandons them, seeing them as tainted, kierkegaar moves on to his next target. His pursuit of Cordelia is a meticulously planned game of cat-and-mouse in which he seeks to exploit every aspect of her character, claiming his love for her is pure – in fact, the purest – while his behaviour remains consistently heartless and self-serving.
Johannes is so Machiavellian that he almost seems to have comical, pantomime-villain qualities – you can just imagine him twirling his moustache – and without any knowledge of the real-life events that led to Kierkegaard writing this story, he’d just seem like a singularly awful protagonist.
With that knowledge, though, the whole thing becomes tragically ironic, and the narrator’s frequent references to past conquests go from comically obnoxious to desperately sad especially since Kierkegaard is believed to have remained celibate for sdduttore rest of his life.
And it does, but at the same time I think it’s obvious it is a component of something bigger, particularly at diaio end when it seems to come to rather an abrupt halt. View all 3 comments.
Diario del seduttore – Søren Kierkegaard – Google Books
Jan 14, Manny rated it liked it Shelves: I was reminded of this book when I got to the big seduction scene in Cohen’s Belle du Seigneur. Solal spends about 30 pages describing in great detail kier,egaard Ariane all the psychological tricks he uses when he goes about performing a seduction, complaining that dizrio are dumb enough to fall for it, and indeed require this kind of treatment. He is ostensibly doing it to repulse her, but in fact his explanation riario very seductive, and indeed works brilliantly.
I get the impression that Kierkegaard was I was reminded of this book when I got to the big seduction scene in Kierkegawrd Belle du Seigneur. I get the impression that Kierkegaard was doing pretty much the same thing with Regine, the secuttore he was keen on, though in real life the effect seems to have been the opposite; they broke up, and never got back together again.
Maybe he was doing her a favor, since the couple in Cohen’s novel don’t exactly have a happy life together. It’s not clear to me whether Cohen is explicitly referring to Kierkegaard, but I think that there are too many parallels for it to be a coincidence.
Basically, Lodge thinks that Kierkegaard was a complete asshole, and should just have had more sense. It’s interesting to see what different takes Kiekegaard and Lodge have on this affair. I don’t think we should take this too seriously, however – the character presenting the argument was pretty drunk at the time. View all 18 comments. Soren Kierkegaard is regarded as one of the first, if not the very first, existentialist philosophers.
It is also one of the 20 books in the Penguin Great Loves collection. This is a book made up of diary entries and letters.
Johannes, the writer, boasts of his skills in the art of seducing women.
He talks of his abilities to keep a distance while a Reason kiermegaard reading: He talks of his abilities to keep a distance while all the time luring them in. His diary covers his pursuit of the innocent young Cordelia, even to the point of engagement. He betrays his friend Edvard, who is genuinely in love with her, for the sake of his own sport.
But just as Cordelia is ready to give herself completely she begins to understand what has happened. My letters do not fail of their purpose. They are developing her mentally, if not erotically. For that I have to use notes. The more prominent the erotic becomes, the shorter the notes will be, but all the more certain to grasp the erotic point.
Diario del seduttore
Nevertheless in order not to make her sentimental or soft, irony stiffens her feelings again, but also gives her appetite for the nourishment most dear to her. The notes give distant and vague hints of the highest. The moment this presentiment begins to dawn in her soul, the relationship fractures. At least it was short. And the format was, in theory, a good one. None of the characters were the slightest bit appealing. I love Denmark, but this work made the country seem dull.
Unless someone comes up with a very convincing argument to the contrary, that is the first and last piece of Kierkegaard’s work I shall be reading. Kierkegaard’s The Seducer’s Diary describes a man Johannes ‘s calculated scheme to seduce a young girl Cordelia into falling in love with him. It is a book of opposites, of painful ironies. I feel ashamed to say that I have been a seducer.
It has felt normal to me, and Sedyttore wondered and still wonder if it is not singularly a paradigm of romantic normalcy – is love a myth? Is ever Kierkegaard’s The Seducer’s Diary describes a man Johannes ‘s calculated scheme to seduce a young girl Cordelia into falling in love with him. Is everything wonderful in love simply seduttore gestures of seduction, the play, the production? I am still not sure, myself.